The European Parliament has set up a revised list does not require that the encryption of a party to a party when you are comfortable but prohibits the background that provides secure access to law enforcement. So European Government Proposes Ban On Encryption Backdoors.
Prime Minister Theresa May and who want to make technology companies like Facebook and Apple and Google create a “background” controversial font, but even somewhere you know it’s not as easy as it seems.
The European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs has published a draft proposal for new laws on electronic privacy and communications and recommends ending encryption at the end (E2E) on all communications And prevent them from behind, access to law enforcement.
It added that “the protection of confidential communications is also a prerequisite for the respect of the rights of other relevant fundamental freedoms and, such as the protection of freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, freedom of expression and the media. ”
Says project, your security is the highest priority
According to the draft, EU citizens need greater protection, not less, and need to know that “the confidentiality and integrity of” data “guarantee”, but the background risk programs “Weaken” privacy.
What is a backdoor? By definition, “Bodor is a feature or bug in the computer system that allows unauthorized access to the data. ”
Many countries have forced governments, including the US Department of Defense, large enterprises to provide access to their services from the back door, enabling Vedanta users to intercept traffic and access to Everything from secure messages to their Internet activities.
But “Technically, there is no back door, which the government can access only, and if the monitoring tools can exploit the weaknesses through design, the attacker, who had access to enjoy the same privilege. ”
Calls for projects for end-to-end encryption and European Government Proposes Ban On Encryption Backdoors
The proposed project recommends using encryption from a party to a party, which will make it difficult for federal officials to request data from technology companies.
The proposal would prohibit users decrypting the encryption of data as well as setting up background structures in software or encryption technologies that could allow government access to user information.
Therefore, if the amendments have been adopted, banning the core software, it will be difficult for the government’s application of Article 49 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Ripa) provided that companies remove the ” Protection “wherever possible.
For those who do not know, end-to-end encryption is a secure connection that encrypts the data on the sending system before the company transmitted to the server. The company then encrypted data is forwarded to the recipient, which is the only person who can decipher.
No one enters, whether the provider request service, Internet service provider (ISP), hackers, or even law enforcement officials, and can be read or falsified data.
“When encrypting electronic communications data, decryption is prohibited, reverse engineering or monitoring these communications,” the project reads.
‘Member States shall not impose any obligation on providers of electronic communications services which will lead to a weakening of the security and encryption of their networks and services. ”
Secure “Internet of Things”
Similarly, the draft also says, the current law has not kept pace with the way machine-to-machine machines to the internet offers citizens things. That’s Why European Government Proposes Ban On Encryption Backdoors.
And communication devices are increasingly connected to communicate with each other by using electronic communications networks.
Therefore, according to the Committee, if these regulations also apply to machine-to-machine communications to “ensure the full protection of privacy rights and confidentiality of communications, Internet-enhanced reliable and secure things in a digital single market. ”
In short, the Committee hopes that all means of communication will be in the future, such as “calls, Internet access and instant messaging applications, e-mail, Internet phone calls and communications through Means of social communication “protected against pirates, government and eye intruders.
The Committee wishes to respect for applications or browsers or Internet service providers, cars, smartphones or fitness tracking devices will only request their customer traces, and to avoid their data only after getting users’ consent.
However, it should be noted that most technology companies are under American law jurisdiction, the era of post-Snowden and proves that as long as the Bank data storage limits, Your policies, and Craig no difference will not occur.